Compare towns
Jericho vs Lowell vs Essex
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Jericho has the most homeowners (92.9%).
Lowell has the most renters (56.8% rent).
Essex has grown the fastest since 2010 (+12.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Jericho | Lowell | Essex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,114Lowest |
118,368Highest |
11,516 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.9%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+8.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
+12.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 49.7±5.1Highest 28% above U.S. |
35.6±0.8Lowest 8% below U.S. |
42.4±1.9 9% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.5%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.7%±1.3 U.S.: 22% |
22.4%±3.3Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Essex and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.2%±4.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
12.6%±0.8Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.9%±3.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Jericho and Essex are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 65.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
30%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
57.6% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.4%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
9.7%±0.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.8%±1.2 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $116,923±$16kHighest 45% above U.S. |
$78,658±$4kLowest about the U.S. average |
$110,199±$14k 36% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Essex are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $493,100±$38kHighest 48% above U.S. |
$429,200±$11kLowest 29% above U.S. |
$447,300±$14k 34% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Essex are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,731±$111Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,625±$40 15% above U.S. |
$1,569±$138Lowest 11% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,318Highest 135% above U.S. |
$4,499Lowest 44% above U.S. |
$6,602 112% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 79.3%±52.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
52.4%±3.8 U.S.: 51.1% |
45.9%±13.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Jericho and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 0.9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
16.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
5% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
43.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
75.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1953Lowest 27 yrs older than U.S. |
1990Highest 10 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 26 min about the U.S. average |
28 minHighest 6% above U.S. |
22 minLowest 17% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 21.8%±6.4Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
10.6%±1.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
21.5%±5.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Jericho and Essex are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #6 of 70 in VT | #255 of 282 in MA | #13 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Lowell | Essex Westford Educational Community Unified Union SD #51 |
| High school in town | Mt. Mansfield Union High School | Lowell High | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 13.0Lowest |
14.8Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.