Compare towns
Hudson vs Needham vs Dedham vs Amesbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Hudson has the most affordable homes ($497k median).
Needham has the most expensive homes ($1189k median).
Dedham has the oldest population (median age 44.6).
Amesbury has the most renters (31.4% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Hudson | Needham | Dedham | Amesbury |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 20,077 |
32,459Highest |
25,237 |
17,403Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.4% MA: +7.4% |
+11.1%Highest MA: +7.4% |
+2.6%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
— |
| Median age | 42.9±1.7Lowest 7% above MA |
43.1±1.6 8% above MA |
44.6±1.6Highest 12% above MA |
43.7±1.7 9% above MA |
| Dedham and Amesbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 19.3%±2.5 MA: 19.4% |
27.5%±2.2Highest MA: 19.4% |
18.6%±1.9Lowest MA: 19.4% |
20%±2.4 MA: 19.4% |
| Age 65+ | 20.1%±2.3 MA: 17.9% |
17.7%±1.7Lowest MA: 17.9% |
21.9%±2Highest MA: 17.9% |
18.2%±2.1 MA: 17.9% |
| Dedham and Hudson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 46.1% MA: 47.3% |
81.9%Highest MA: 47.3% |
55% MA: 47.3% |
44.8%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4%±1Lowest MA: 7.9% |
5.4%±1.1 MA: 7.9% |
5.6%±1Highest MA: 7.9% |
4.1%±1.3 MA: 7.9% |
| Dedham and Needham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $103,400±$13kLowest about the MA average |
$214,308±$13kHighest 106% above MA |
$128,955±$10k 24% above MA |
$103,554±$12k about the MA average |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $496,800±$22kLowest 12% below MA |
$1,188,500±$43kHighest 111% above MA |
$661,800±$16k 18% above MA |
$519,300±$32k 8% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,406±$82Lowest 20% below MA |
$2,409±$183Highest 37% above MA |
$2,042±$182 16% above MA |
$1,683±$115 4% below MA |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,892Lowest 15% above MA |
$10,000+Highest at least 67% above MA |
$7,918 32% above MA |
$7,360 23% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.8%±8.7Lowest MA: 51.8% |
55.9%±8.5 MA: 51.8% |
56.4%±10 MA: 51.8% |
66.7%±10.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Amesbury and Dedham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 5.3% MA: 10% |
3.7%Lowest MA: 10% |
5.6% MA: 10% |
7.1%Highest MA: 10% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 73.2% MA: 62.5% |
83.1%Highest MA: 62.5% |
73.4% MA: 62.5% |
68.6%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1970Highest 6 yrs newer than MA |
1965 1 yr newer than MA |
1956Lowest 8 yrs older than MA |
1969 5 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minHighest 6% above MA |
28 minLowest 5% below MA |
29 min about the MA average |
29 min about the MA average |
| Work from home | 19.6%±3.6 MA: 18.6% |
32.4%±2.4Highest MA: 18.6% |
20%±2.7 MA: 18.6% |
17.4%±2.8Lowest MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #224 of 282 in MA | #19 of 282 in MA | #119 of 282 in MA | #151 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Hudson | Needham | — | Amesbury |
| High school in town | Hudson High | Needham High | — | Amesbury High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.2Lowest |
11.9Highest |
— | 10.9 |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.