Compare towns
Hoosick vs Jericho vs Pittstown
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Hoosick has the most affordable homes ($177k median).
Jericho has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.9%).
Pittstown has the youngest population (median age 40.1).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Hoosick | Jericho | Pittstown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 6,671Highest |
5,114Lowest |
5,474 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.1% U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-3.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.9±5.5 15% above U.S. |
49.7±5.1Highest 28% above U.S. |
40.1±7.5Lowest 3% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Hoosick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 22.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.5%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.7%±5.3 U.S.: 22% |
| Hoosick and Pittstown are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.7%±4.5Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.2%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.6%±4.8 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Hoosick and Pittstown are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 24%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
65.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
26.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±1.7Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.1%±1.6 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Hoosick and Pittstown are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $63,372±$21kLowest 22% below U.S. |
$116,923±$16kHighest 45% above U.S. |
$92,098±$13k 14% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Pittstown are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $177,200±$21kLowest 47% below U.S. |
$493,100±$38kHighest 48% above U.S. |
$256,800±$41k 23% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $881±$148Lowest 38% below U.S. |
$1,731±$111Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,176±$263 17% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,071Lowest 31% above U.S. |
$7,318Highest 135% above U.S. |
$5,091 63% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43%±13.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
79.3%±52.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
49.5%±24.1 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Jericho and Pittstown are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 12.8% U.S.: 12.5% |
0.9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.1%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
92.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
93.2%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1954Lowest 26 yrs older than U.S. |
1983Highest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1983Highest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 21% above U.S. |
26 minLowest about the U.S. average |
29 min 11% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 16.3%±5.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
21.8%±6.4Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
10.5%±5.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Jericho and Hoosick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #62 of 484 in NY | #6 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | HOOSICK FALLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | — |
| High school in town | HOOSICK FALLS HIGH SCHOOL | Mt. Mansfield Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.7Lowest |
13.0Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.