Compare towns
Hooksett vs Pittsford vs Proctor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
Pittsford has the oldest population (median age 47.7).
Proctor has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Hooksett | Pittsford | Proctor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,057Highest |
2,892 |
1,794Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +10.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-4.3%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 41.3±1.5Lowest 6% above U.S. |
47.7±6.3Highest 23% above U.S. |
42.4±6.4 9% above U.S. |
| Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.4%±2.9 U.S.: 22% |
15.1%±5.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.8%±4.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Proctor and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.3%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
25.4%±6.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.4%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
37% U.S.: 35.7% |
28.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.6%±1.7 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $117,962±$11kHighest 46% above U.S. |
$69,705±$7kLowest 14% below U.S. |
$74,167±$12k 8% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $407,000±$26kHighest 22% above U.S. |
$197,000±$33kLowest 41% below U.S. |
$209,900±$17k 37% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,661±$206Highest 18% above U.S. |
$781±$167Lowest 45% below U.S. |
$1,029±$202 27% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,554Highest 110% above U.S. |
$3,378Lowest 8% above U.S. |
$4,032 29% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.7%±16.4Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
18.5%±12.3Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
37.3%±16.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Hooksett and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
11.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
16.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
86.7%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1988Highest 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1972 8 yrs older than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 minHighest about the U.S. average |
25 min 5% below U.S. |
22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 13.4%±3.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
10.1%±6.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Hooksett and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #30 of 120 in NH | #54 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Hooksett School District | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 8.7 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.