Compare towns
Holderness vs Ashland vs Canterbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Holderness has the youngest population (median age 39.4).
Ashland has the most affordable homes ($227k median).
Canterbury has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Holderness | Ashland | Canterbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,917Lowest |
2,183 |
2,353Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.9% NH: +4.6% |
-6.6%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+1.6%Highest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 39.4±7.4Lowest 9% below NH |
42.3±11.2 about the NH average |
48.6±3.8Highest 12% above NH |
| Canterbury and Ashland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.7%±9.3Lowest NH: 18.2% |
21.4%±6.4Highest NH: 18.2% |
17.4%±4.4 NH: 18.2% |
| Ashland and Canterbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 31.4%±4.6Highest NH: 20.1% |
25.8%±5.3 NH: 20.1% |
22.9%±3.3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Holderness and Ashland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 55.7%Highest NH: 40.6% |
35.9%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
49.3% NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±1.6Lowest NH: 6% |
2.7%±1.7 NH: 6% |
6.8%±3Highest NH: 6% |
| Canterbury and Ashland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $107,863±$45k 9% above NH |
$54,607±$9kLowest 45% below NH |
$129,333±$37kHighest 31% above NH |
| Canterbury and Holderness are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $363,100±$60k 10% below NH |
$227,000±$29kLowest 44% below NH |
$443,700±$21kHighest 10% above NH |
| Canterbury and Holderness are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,068±$385 39% above NH |
$1,096±$155Lowest 26% below NH |
$2,136±$233Highest 43% above NH |
| Canterbury and Holderness are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,923Lowest 41% below NH |
$4,961 26% below NH |
$7,421Highest 11% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 23.5%±21.2Lowest NH: 48.2% |
39.1%±14.8 NH: 48.2% |
71.7%±48.3Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Canterbury and Ashland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 12.1% NH: 7.2% |
21.1%Highest NH: 7.2% |
5.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 83.7% NH: 72.8% |
64.1%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
93.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 2 yrs newer than NH |
1978Lowest 1 yr older than NH |
1982Highest 3 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min about the NH average |
26 minLowest 4% below NH |
33 minHighest 22% above NH |
| Work from home | 9.4%±4.1Lowest NH: 16.8% |
9.9%±4.6 NH: 16.8% |
21.6%±7.4Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Canterbury and Ashland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Holderness School District | Ashland School District | Shaker Regional School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.