Compare towns

Harvard vs Putnam vs Killingly vs Lancaster

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Harvard has the most expensive homes ($834k median).
Putnam has the most renters (49.3% rent).
Killingly has the youngest population (median age 39.5).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureHarvardPutnamKillinglyLancaster
People
Population
6,927Lowest
7,120
17,867Highest
8,606
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+5.1%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
-2.1%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
+4.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
44.1±4.7Highest
13% above U.S.
41.2±5.1
6% above U.S.
39.5±3Lowest
about the U.S. average
43.1±4.9
11% above U.S.
Harvard and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21.1%±4.5Highest
U.S.: 22%
18.9%±4.3Lowest
U.S.: 22%
19.8%±2.3
U.S.: 22%
19.2%±4
U.S.: 22%
Harvard and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
16.3%±2.8Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
17%±3.7
U.S.: 17.2%
19.7%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
19.9%±4.2Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
62%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
18.8%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
22.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
50.3%
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3.8%±1.5
U.S.: 6.4%
4.2%±1.8
U.S.: 6.4%
5.4%±1.9Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
3%±1.8Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Killingly and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$213,996±$24kHighest
165% above U.S.
$65,511±$7kLowest
19% below U.S.
$84,350±$8k
4% above U.S.
$134,833±$27k
67% above U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$833,600±$54kHighest
151% above U.S.
$245,100±$13kLowest
26% below U.S.
$288,600±$15k
13% below U.S.
$519,100±$60k
56% above U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,321±$424
7% below U.S.
$1,147±$43
19% below U.S.
$1,044±$141Lowest
26% below U.S.
$2,338±$539Highest
65% above U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$10,000+Highest
at least 221% above U.S.
$3,564Lowest
14% above U.S.
$3,922
26% above U.S.
$7,235
132% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
72.5%±51.5Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
38.2%±12.1Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
42.8%±10.9
U.S.: 51.1%
68.3%±36.7
U.S.: 51.1%
Harvard and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
4.5%
U.S.: 12.5%
11.7%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
11.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
1.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
89.4%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
50.7%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
71.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
85.1%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1975Highest
5 yrs older than U.S.
1956Lowest
24 yrs older than U.S.
1968
12 yrs older than U.S.
1971
9 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
32 min
20% above U.S.
25 minLowest
5% below U.S.
28 min
6% above U.S.
32 minHighest
20% above U.S.
Work from home
44.8%±6.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
6.7%±2.7Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
11.1%±2.3
U.S.: 15.1%
33.6%±9.1
U.S.: 15.1%
Harvard and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #12 of 282 in MA #128 of 149 in CT #136 of 149 in CT #145 of 282 in MA
School district Harvard — Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Nashoba
High school in town The Bromfield High School — Killingly High School None in town
Students per teacherat that high school
11.0Lowest
—
11.1Highest
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History 12 photos → None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.