Compare towns
Hardwick vs Newfane vs Pittsford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Hardwick has the highest household income ($92k).
Newfane has the most people working from home (30.8%).
Pittsford has the shortest commute (25 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Hardwick | Newfane | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,965Highest |
1,456Lowest |
2,892 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-4.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-4.3% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.1±7.4Lowest 9% above VT |
54.4±3.9Highest 26% above VT |
47.7±6.3 11% above VT |
| Newfane and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
11.1%±3.7Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Hardwick and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27%±5.9 VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±3.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
25.4%±6.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Newfane and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 33.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
46.5%Highest VT: 43.8% |
37% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.4%±2.4Lowest VT: 7% |
2.4%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
3%±2.1Highest VT: 7% |
| Pittsford and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,297±$17kHighest 14% above VT |
$66,719±$21kLowest 18% below VT |
$69,705±$7k 14% below VT |
| Hardwick and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $184,700±$39kLowest 42% below VT |
$284,200±$49kHighest 10% below VT |
$197,000±$33k 38% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $875±$406 29% below VT |
$1,266±$238Highest about the VT average |
$781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
| Newfane and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,351 14% below VT |
$5,174Highest about the VT average |
$3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.6%±41.3 VT: 48.4% |
51.9%±79.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Newfane and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
10.9% VT: 10.1% |
11.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
87.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.6% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1962Lowest 14 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1972Highest 4 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 minHighest 23% above VT |
27 min 13% above VT |
25 minLowest 7% above VT |
| Work from home | 11.8%±6 VT: 16.9% |
30.8%±12.5Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±6.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #68 of 70 in VT | — | #54 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mountain View Union Elementary School District #94 · Hazen Union High School District #26 | West River Valley Union Education District #72A | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 |
| High school in town | Hazen Union High School | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.6 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.