Compare towns

Hanson vs Lancaster vs Mapleton vs Hanover

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Hanson has the most homeowners (89%).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
Mapleton has the most affordable homes ($192k median).
Hanover has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.9%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureHansonLancasterMapletonHanover
People
Population
10,660
8,606
1,884Lowest
14,845Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+4.2%
U.S.: +7.4%
+4.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
-3.2%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+6.9%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
42.8±3
10% above U.S.
43.1±4.9Highest
11% above U.S.
41.8±6Lowest
7% above U.S.
41.8±1.4Lowest
7% above U.S.
Lancaster and Hanson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21.6%±3.7
U.S.: 22%
19.2%±4Lowest
U.S.: 22%
22.2%±5.1
U.S.: 22%
26.1%±3.5Highest
U.S.: 22%
Hanover and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.7%±3
U.S.: 17.2%
19.9%±4.2Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
18.3%±3.1
U.S.: 17.2%
16.1%±2.1Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
Lancaster and Hanson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
42.6%
U.S.: 35.7%
50.3%
U.S.: 35.7%
34.3%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
56.8%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
4.8%±2.2
U.S.: 6.4%
3%±1.8Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
5%±2.9Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
4.1%±1.6
U.S.: 6.4%
Mapleton and Hanson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$132,200±$10k
64% above U.S.
$134,833±$27k
67% above U.S.
$91,731±$25kLowest
14% above U.S.
$189,803±$23kHighest
135% above U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$533,900±$36k
60% above U.S.
$519,100±$60k
56% above U.S.
$191,800±$23kLowest
42% below U.S.
$755,400±$39kHighest
127% above U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,821±$860
29% above U.S.
$2,338±$539Highest
65% above U.S.
$610±$277Lowest
57% below U.S.
$1,845±$341
31% above U.S.
Lancaster and Hanover are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$6,402
105% above U.S.
$7,235
132% above U.S.
$1,789Lowest
43% below U.S.
$9,342Highest
200% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
69%±33.1Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
68.3%±36.7
U.S.: 51.1%
16.7%±10.5Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
65%±23.8
U.S.: 51.1%
Hanson and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
2.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
1.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.9%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
4.8%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
89%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
85.1%
U.S.: 65.2%
79.9%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
84.5%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1972
8 yrs older than U.S.
1971Lowest
9 yrs older than U.S.
1977
3 yrs older than U.S.
1978Highest
2 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
34 minHighest
27% above U.S.
32 min
20% above U.S.
28 minLowest
5% above U.S.
32 min
21% above U.S.
Work from home
7.9%±2.5Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
33.6%±9.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
10.8%±3.8
U.S.: 15.1%
19.6%±4.8
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #149 of 282 in MA #145 of 282 in MA — #69 of 282 in MA
School district Whitman-Hanson Nashoba RSU 79/MSAD 01 Hanover · South Shore Regional Vocational Technical
High school in town Whitman Hanson Regional None in town None in town South Shore Vocational Technical High
Students per teacherat that high school
14.7Highest
— —
10.3Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.