Compare towns
Guilford vs Sharon vs Vernon
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Guilford has the most people working from home (16.7%).
Sharon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.9%).
Vernon has the shortest commute (20 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Guilford | Sharon | Vernon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,461 |
1,577Lowest |
2,709Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | 0% VT: +2.8% |
+3.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.6%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 46.7±5.2Highest 8% above VT |
45.6±7.7 6% above VT |
42.6±5.4Lowest about the VT average |
| Guilford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.5%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
21%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±3.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Sharon and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.6%±4Highest VT: 21.4% |
25.1%±3.6 VT: 21.4% |
22.8%±2.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Guilford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 44.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
37.9% VT: 43.8% |
26.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±2.4 VT: 7% |
1.5%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
| Vernon and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,243±$6kLowest 7% below VT |
$84,375±$17k 4% above VT |
$85,682±$9kHighest 6% above VT |
| Vernon and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $312,600±$39k about the VT average |
$346,700±$37kHighest 10% above VT |
$285,100±$25kLowest 10% below VT |
| Sharon and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,283±$273 4% above VT |
$1,386±$155Highest 12% above VT |
$1,023±$214Lowest 17% below VT |
| Sharon and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,827 16% above VT |
$5,903Highest 17% above VT |
$5,191Lowest 3% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 46.9%±19.4Highest VT: 48.4% |
19.8%±17.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
26.2%±3.7 VT: 48.4% |
| Guilford and Vernon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
5.5% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
79.7% VT: 73.2% |
76.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1980 4 yrs newer than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1979Lowest 3 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 7% above VT |
26 minHighest 12% above VT |
20 minLowest 14% below VT |
| Work from home | 16.7%±5.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.7%±3.7 VT: 16.9% |
6.4%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Guilford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #30 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 | Sharon School District | Vernon School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.