Compare towns
Groton vs Warner vs Hebron vs Sullivan
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Warner has the most people working from home (16.6%).
Hebron has the most expensive homes ($590k median).
Sullivan has the highest household income ($107k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Groton | Warner | Hebron | Sullivan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 507Lowest |
2,959Highest |
883 |
687 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+3.7% NH: +4.6% |
+5%Highest NH: +4.6% |
-2.8% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 51.1±16.2 18% above NH |
43.7±4Lowest about the NH average |
57.9±3.6Highest 34% above NH |
46.6±6.5 8% above NH |
| Hebron and Groton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 15.4%±4.6 NH: 18.2% |
17.3%±3.3Highest NH: 18.2% |
12.2%±3.9Lowest NH: 18.2% |
16.3%±5 NH: 18.2% |
| Warner and Sullivan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 29.4%±4.8 NH: 20.1% |
20.4%±3.5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
37.8%±9.3Highest NH: 20.1% |
20.5%±3.6 NH: 20.1% |
| Hebron and Groton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 29.2% NH: 40.6% |
42.4% NH: 40.6% |
47.6%Highest NH: 40.6% |
28.5%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2%±2Lowest NH: 6% |
5.3%±1.6Highest NH: 6% |
2.4%±4.3 NH: 6% |
3.9%±2.6 NH: 6% |
| Warner and Sullivan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $85,625±$21kLowest 14% below NH |
$94,022±$18k 5% below NH |
$91,071±$17k 8% below NH |
$106,667±$20kHighest 8% above NH |
| Sullivan and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $269,000±$45k 33% below NH |
$353,100±$22k 12% below NH |
$589,500±$61kHighest 46% above NH |
$236,500±$29kLowest 41% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,667±$295Highest 79% above NH |
$1,219±$123Lowest 18% below NH |
$1,429±$334 4% below NH |
$1,225±$275 18% below NH |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,873Lowest 57% below NH |
$7,650Highest 15% above NH |
$3,603 46% below NH |
$5,099 24% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 50%±83.6Highest NH: 48.2% |
48.7%±21.3 NH: 48.2% |
40%±38.3Lowest NH: 48.2% |
40%±84.5Lowest NH: 48.2% |
| Groton and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 10.5% NH: 7.2% |
8.4% NH: 7.2% |
15.2%Highest NH: 7.2% |
4.1%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 91.3% NH: 72.8% |
74.6%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
86.8% NH: 72.8% |
93.6%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1984Highest 5 yrs newer than NH |
1975Lowest 4 yrs older than NH |
1977 2 yrs older than NH |
1979 same as NH |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 29 min 10% above NH |
32 min 19% above NH |
19 minLowest 27% below NH |
32 minHighest 20% above NH |
| Work from home | 13.7%±6.5 NH: 16.8% |
16.6%±4.8Highest NH: 16.8% |
13.1%±5.1 NH: 16.8% |
4.2%±2.5Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Warner and Groton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Schools | ||||
| School district | — | Kearsarge Regional School District | — | — |
| High school in town | — | None in town | — | — |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.