Compare towns
Griswold vs Prospect vs Putnam
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Griswold has the oldest population (median age 48.1).
Prospect has the highest household income ($126k).
Putnam has the most renters (40.2% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Griswold | Prospect | Putnam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 11,530Highest |
9,458 |
9,292Lowest |
| Median age | 48.1±3.9Highest 17% above CT |
46.8±3.9 14% above CT |
43.7±3Lowest 6% above CT |
| Griswold and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.5%±3.7Lowest CT: 20.2% |
21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
18.6%±3.6 CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.8%±3.5Lowest CT: 18.5% |
24.5%±4.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
18.5%±3.1 CT: 18.5% |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 19.9%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
40.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
20% CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.8%±1.1Lowest CT: 7.1% |
3.5%±1.8 CT: 7.1% |
3.9%±1.4Highest CT: 7.1% |
| Putnam and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $78,719±$11k 18% below CT |
$126,394±$18kHighest 32% above CT |
$70,561±$7kLowest 26% below CT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $275,900±$42k 25% below CT |
$355,400±$21kHighest 3% below CT |
$269,200±$11kLowest 27% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,177±$65 21% below CT |
$1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
$1,149±$44Lowest 23% below CT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,628 30% below CT |
$6,504Highest about the CT average |
$3,860Lowest 42% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 57.5%±15.5Highest CT: 52.6% |
45.3%±31.8 CT: 52.6% |
37.7%±11.6Lowest CT: 52.6% |
| Griswold and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.6% CT: 10% |
3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
11.5%Highest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 73.3% CT: 66.5% |
93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
59.8%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1977Highest 10 yrs newer than CT |
1974 7 yrs newer than CT |
1961Lowest 6 yrs older than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minHighest 17% above CT |
28 min 4% above CT |
25 minLowest 6% below CT |
| Work from home | 9%±3.6Lowest CT: 16% |
10.1%±3.2Highest CT: 16% |
9%±2.8Lowest CT: 16% |
| Prospect and Griswold are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #118 of 149 in CT | #50 of 149 in CT | #128 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Griswold School District | Regional School District 16 | Putnam School District |
| High school in town | Griswold High School | None in town | Putnam High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.5Highest |
— | 9.5Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.