Compare towns

Griswold vs Lancaster vs Killingly vs Winchester

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
Killingly has the youngest population (median age 39.5).
Winchester has the most affordable homes ($250k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureGriswoldLancasterKillinglyWinchester
People
Population
11,530
8,606Lowest
17,867Highest
10,284
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
+4.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
— —
Median age
48.1±3.9
24% above U.S.
43.1±4.9
11% above U.S.
39.5±3Lowest
about the U.S. average
49.1±6.2Highest
26% above U.S.
Winchester and Griswold are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.5%±3.7
U.S.: 22%
19.2%±4
U.S.: 22%
19.8%±2.3Highest
U.S.: 22%
15.4%±2.9Lowest
U.S.: 22%
Killingly and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
17.8%±3.5Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
19.9%±4.2
U.S.: 17.2%
19.7%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
27.4%±5.1Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
Winchester and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
19.9%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
50.3%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
22.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
27.8%
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
1.8%±1.1Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
3%±1.8
U.S.: 6.4%
5.4%±1.9Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
4.2%±1.7
U.S.: 6.4%
Killingly and Winchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$78,719±$11k
about the U.S. average
$134,833±$27kHighest
67% above U.S.
$84,350±$8k
4% above U.S.
$66,519±$12kLowest
18% below U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$275,900±$42k
17% below U.S.
$519,100±$60kHighest
56% above U.S.
$288,600±$15k
13% below U.S.
$249,500±$17kLowest
25% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,177±$65
17% below U.S.
$2,338±$539Highest
65% above U.S.
$1,044±$141Lowest
26% below U.S.
$1,174±$116
17% below U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,628
48% above U.S.
$7,235Highest
132% above U.S.
$3,922Lowest
26% above U.S.
$4,780
53% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
57.5%±15.5
U.S.: 51.1%
68.3%±36.7Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
42.8%±10.9Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
48.9%±15.8
U.S.: 51.1%
Lancaster and Griswold are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
7.6%
U.S.: 12.5%
1.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
11.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
12.8%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
73.3%
U.S.: 65.2%
85.1%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
71.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
65.8%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1977Highest
3 yrs older than U.S.
1971
9 yrs older than U.S.
1968
12 yrs older than U.S.
1955Lowest
25 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
17% above U.S.
32 minHighest
20% above U.S.
28 min
6% above U.S.
26 minLowest
about the U.S. average
Work from home
9%±3.6
U.S.: 15.1%
33.6%±9.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
11.1%±2.3
U.S.: 15.1%
6.9%±2.7Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #118 of 149 in CT #145 of 282 in MA #136 of 149 in CT #97 of 149 in CT
School district Griswold School District Nashoba Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Explorations District · Regional School District 07
High school in town Griswold High School None in town Killingly High School Northwestern Regional High School
Students per teacherat that high school
11.5Highest
—
11.1
9.7Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.