Compare towns
Greenfield vs Ogunquit vs Gardner vs Clinton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Greenfield has the shortest commute (17 min average).
Ogunquit has the most people working from home (43.3%).
Clinton has the youngest population (median age 38.6).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Greenfield | Ogunquit | Gardner | Clinton |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 17,664 |
1,379Lowest |
21,148Highest |
15,563 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +76.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+5.2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+13.4% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.6±2.1 15% above U.S. |
62.8±4.8Highest 61% above U.S. |
43.7±2.3 12% above U.S. |
38.6±2.7Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Kids under 18 | 18.3%±1.9Highest U.S.: 22% |
5.7%±3.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
18.3%±2.3Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.8%±2.5 U.S.: 22% |
| Age 65+ | 23.4%±2.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
43.6%±10.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.6%±2.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
14.5%±2.8Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
63.5%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
23.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
36.6% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.7%±0.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.2%±2.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
4.6%±1.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
6.9%±2Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Clinton and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $55,614±$7kLowest 31% below U.S. |
$114,259±$56kHighest 42% above U.S. |
$67,518±$8k 16% below U.S. |
$89,781±$10k 11% above U.S. |
| Ogunquit and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $263,100±$16kLowest 21% below U.S. |
$875,700±$79kHighest 163% above U.S. |
$301,600±$20k 9% below U.S. |
$387,300±$19k 16% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,107±$67Lowest 22% below U.S. |
— | $1,109±$51 22% below U.S. |
$1,402±$76Highest about the U.S. average |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,769Highest 53% above U.S. |
$4,473 43% above U.S. |
$4,150Lowest 33% above U.S. |
$4,654 49% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 63.2%±7.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
0%±61.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
49.7%±8.6 U.S.: 51.1% |
40.3%±6.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Greenfield and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 15.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3.2%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
8.6% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 55.7% U.S.: 65.2% |
94.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
58.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
54.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1947Lowest 33 yrs older than U.S. |
1978Highest 2 yrs older than U.S. |
1954 26 yrs older than U.S. |
1956 24 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 17 minLowest 34% below U.S. |
26 min about the U.S. average |
31 minHighest 16% above U.S. |
30 min 13% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 11.9%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
43.3%±12.4Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.3%±3.6 U.S.: 15.1% |
14.2%±4.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #257 of 282 in MA | — | #273 of 282 in MA | #246 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Greenfield | — | Gardner | Clinton |
| High school in town | Greenfield High | — | Gardner High | Clinton Senior High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.9Lowest |
— | 13.5Highest |
12.8 |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.