Compare towns
Grantham vs Wolfeboro vs Barre
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Grantham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14%).
Wolfeboro has the most people working from home (22.9%).
Barre has the most affordable homes ($210k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Grantham | Wolfeboro | Barre |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,465Lowest |
6,571 |
8,412Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +14%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
-6.2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50.4±7.5 30% above U.S. |
57±1.8Highest 47% above U.S. |
42.2±6.6Lowest 8% above U.S. |
| Wolfeboro and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.1%±6.6Highest U.S.: 22% |
13.7%±3.3 U.S.: 22% |
13.5%±3.8Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Grantham and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17%±6.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
34.6%±5.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.4%±3.9 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 59.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
45% U.S.: 35.7% |
36.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.8%±6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.8%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.4%±1.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Grantham and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $106,403±$54kHighest 32% above U.S. |
$94,375±$22k 17% above U.S. |
$65,625±$7kLowest 19% below U.S. |
| Grantham and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $343,100±$39k 3% above U.S. |
$546,500±$60kHighest 64% above U.S. |
$210,400±$15kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,103±$76Highest 22% below U.S. |
$1,093±$58Lowest 23% below U.S. |
| Wolfeboro and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,605Highest 144% above U.S. |
$4,531Lowest 45% above U.S. |
$5,192 66% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | — | 12%±11.6Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
34.4%±10.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Below poverty line | 0%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
17.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 100%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
78.1% U.S.: 65.2% |
50.4%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1987Highest 7 yrs newer than U.S. |
1982 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
1947Lowest 33 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 min 15% below U.S. |
24 minHighest 10% below U.S. |
19 minLowest 30% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 13.8%±6.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
22.9%±6.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
10.5%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Wolfeboro and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #6 of 120 in NH | #46 of 120 in NH | #19 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Grantham School District | Governor Wentworth Regional School District | Barre Unified Union School District #97 · Central Vermont Career Center |
| High school in town | None in town | Kingswood Regional High School | Spaulding Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 11.1Highest |
10.7Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.