Compare towns
Grantham vs Randolph vs Wolfeboro
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Grantham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14%).
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Wolfeboro has the most people working from home (22.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Grantham | Randolph | Wolfeboro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,465Lowest |
4,843 |
6,571Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +14%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50.4±7.5 30% above U.S. |
40.4±7.4Lowest 4% above U.S. |
57±1.8Highest 47% above U.S. |
| Wolfeboro and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.1%±6.6Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.3%±4.4 U.S.: 22% |
13.7%±3.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Grantham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17%±6.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.9%±4.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
34.6%±5.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 59.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
45% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.8%±6 U.S.: 6.4% |
11.2%±2.5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.8%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Randolph and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $106,403±$54kHighest 32% above U.S. |
$76,758±$6kLowest 5% below U.S. |
$94,375±$22k 17% above U.S. |
| Grantham and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $343,100±$39k 3% above U.S. |
$278,700±$38kLowest 16% below U.S. |
$546,500±$60kHighest 64% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,172±$173Highest 17% below U.S. |
$1,103±$76Lowest 22% below U.S. |
| Randolph and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,605Highest 144% above U.S. |
$4,698 51% above U.S. |
$4,531Lowest 45% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | — | 54.1%±17.8Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
12%±11.6Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Below poverty line | 0%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
8.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 100%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
67.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
78.1% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1987Highest 7 yrs newer than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1982 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 min 15% below U.S. |
21 minLowest 22% below U.S. |
24 minHighest 10% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 13.8%±6.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
22.9%±6.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Wolfeboro and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #6 of 120 in NH | #55 of 70 in VT | #46 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Grantham School District | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Governor Wentworth Regional School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | Kingswood Regional High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4Lowest |
11.1Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.