Compare towns
Franklin vs Richford vs Swanton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Franklin has the most people working from home (18.1%).
Richford has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.6%).
Swanton has the shortest commute (21 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Franklin | Richford | Swanton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,590Lowest |
2,467 |
2,670Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.4% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 38.8±6.9 10% below VT |
39±3.6Highest 10% below VT |
37.8±4.7Lowest 12% below VT |
| Richford and Franklin are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23.5%±5.6 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.3%±8.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Swanton and Franklin are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 15.3%±1.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
23.4%±4.4Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.3%±2.7 VT: 21.4% |
| Richford and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 21.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
20.8% VT: 43.8% |
20.2%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.5%±3.1Highest VT: 7% |
6.4%±3.6 VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.7Lowest VT: 7% |
| Franklin and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $79,917±$21kHighest about the VT average |
$56,853±$13kLowest 30% below VT |
$66,607±$27k 18% below VT |
| Franklin and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $247,400±$66kHighest 22% below VT |
$176,600±$16kLowest 44% below VT |
$229,000±$15k 28% below VT |
| Franklin and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $891±$266Lowest 28% below VT |
$1,160±$66 6% below VT |
$1,238±$103Highest about the VT average |
| Swanton and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,384 33% below VT |
$3,300Lowest 35% below VT |
$4,370Highest 13% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 45.5%±42.2 VT: 48.4% |
55.1%±15.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
36.1%±21.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Richford and Franklin are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
19.5% VT: 10.1% |
20.1%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
70.4% VT: 73.2% |
64.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1952 24 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 8% above VT |
28 minHighest 18% above VT |
21 minLowest 9% below VT |
| Work from home | 18.1%±4.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.8%±3.9 VT: 16.9% |
7.4%±4.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Franklin and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Missisquoi Valley School District #89 | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Richford Junior/Senior High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.1 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.