Compare towns
Fitzwilliam vs Sutton vs Exeter
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Fitzwilliam has the most affordable homes ($306k median).
Sutton has the most kids (20.5% under 18).
Exeter has grown the fastest since 2010 (+12.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Fitzwilliam | Sutton | Exeter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,278 |
2,239Lowest |
16,151Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.9%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+7.7% NH: +4.6% |
+12.2%Highest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 49.2±4.2Highest 14% above NH |
48.1±4.1 11% above NH |
45.8±2.3Lowest 6% above NH |
| Fitzwilliam and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.1%±2.9Lowest NH: 18.2% |
20.5%±3.8Highest NH: 18.2% |
17%±2.7 NH: 18.2% |
| Sutton and Exeter are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27%±3.4Highest NH: 20.1% |
21.6%±5.9Lowest NH: 20.1% |
24.4%±2.8 NH: 20.1% |
| Fitzwilliam and Exeter are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.6%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
44.3% NH: 40.6% |
59.2%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2%±0.8Lowest NH: 6% |
4.9%±3.6 NH: 6% |
6.1%±1.8Highest NH: 6% |
| Exeter and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $100,735±$11kLowest about the NH average |
$130,313±$31kHighest 32% above NH |
$110,346±$13k 11% above NH |
| Sutton and Exeter are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $305,900±$34kLowest 24% below NH |
$362,600±$16k 10% below NH |
$456,600±$21kHighest 13% above NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,656±$614Lowest 11% above NH |
$1,856±$223Highest 24% above NH |
| Exeter and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,173Lowest 22% below NH |
$7,652 15% above NH |
$8,814Highest 32% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 72.1%±51.8Highest NH: 48.2% |
27.6%±47.2Lowest NH: 48.2% |
59%±11.3 NH: 48.2% |
| Fitzwilliam and Exeter are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.2%Highest NH: 7.2% |
4.8% NH: 7.2% |
4.7%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.2% NH: 72.8% |
95.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
69.1%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1967Lowest 12 yrs older than NH |
1971 8 yrs older than NH |
1979Highest same as NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 39 minHighest 48% above NH |
29 min 10% above NH |
25 minLowest 7% below NH |
| Work from home | 18.6%±4.9 NH: 16.8% |
14.8%±5.6Lowest NH: 16.8% |
19.9%±3.7Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Exeter and Fitzwilliam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #22 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Monadnock Regional School District | Kearsarge Regional School District | Exeter Region Cooperative School District · Exeter School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Kearsarge Regional High School | Exeter High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4Lowest |
12.1Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | 59 photos → |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.