Compare towns
Fair Haven vs Sudbury vs Enosburgh
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Fair Haven has the most affordable homes ($177k median).
Sudbury has the highest household income ($100k).
Enosburgh has the most renters (24.3% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Fair Haven | Sudbury | Enosburgh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,724 |
679Lowest |
2,804Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 39.2±7.6Lowest 9% below VT |
45.4±4.9Highest 5% above VT |
40.6±3.9 6% below VT |
| Sudbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.4%±5.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
22.2%±7.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Sudbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.4%±4.5 VT: 21.4% |
21.8%±4.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Sudbury and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 23.7% VT: 43.8% |
34.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.1%±2.9 VT: 7% |
3.7%±2.4Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
| Enosburgh and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $62,404±$16kLowest 23% below VT |
$100,208±$33kHighest 23% above VT |
$63,828±$17k 21% below VT |
| Sudbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $176,500±$14kLowest 44% below VT |
$338,500±$49kHighest 7% above VT |
$223,100±$39k 30% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $830±$116Lowest 33% below VT |
— | $852±$87Highest 31% below VT |
| Enosburgh and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,865 23% below VT |
$4,205Highest 17% below VT |
$3,624Lowest 28% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 50.9%±20.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Fair Haven and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 18.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
3.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
13.9% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.6% VT: 73.2% |
95.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
75.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minLowest 31% above VT |
50 minHighest 113% above VT |
32 min 36% above VT |
| Work from home | 4.3%±2.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
13.2%±9.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4 VT: 16.9% |
| Sudbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #66 of 70 in VT | — | #26 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 | — | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 |
| High school in town | Fair Haven Union Middle and High School | — | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.8Highest |
— | 10.4Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | 12 photos → | 10 photos → | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.