Compare towns
Epping vs Warwick vs Ware
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Warwick has the oldest population (median age 51.4).
Ware has the most affordable homes ($290k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Warwick | Ware |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430 |
776Lowest |
10,048Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
0%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5 16% above U.S. |
51.4±7.3Highest 32% above U.S. |
43.1±4.7Lowest 11% above U.S. |
| Warwick and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8 U.S.: 22% |
9.9%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.1%±3.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Ware and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
23.2%±3.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.6%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Warwick and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37% U.S.: 35.7% |
40.5%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
24%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.4%±2.2 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Epping and Ware are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7kHighest 29% above U.S. |
$93,333±$22k 16% above U.S. |
$67,475±$15kLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Epping and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35kHighest 31% above U.S. |
$349,400±$34k 5% above U.S. |
$289,700±$28kLowest 13% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,367±$163 3% below U.S. |
$1,043±$109Lowest 26% below U.S. |
| Epping and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936Highest 122% above U.S. |
$4,380 40% above U.S. |
$4,237Lowest 36% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
33.3%±57.3Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
64.3%±16.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Epping and Ware are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
5% U.S.: 12.5% |
11.8%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
89%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
72.3%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 9 yrs newer than U.S. |
1974 6 yrs older than U.S. |
1960Lowest 20 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 22% above U.S. |
40 minHighest 52% above U.S. |
28 minLowest 8% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
22.4%±6.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
12.3%±3.8Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Epping and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | — | #267 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Epping School District | Warwick | Ware |
| High school in town | Epping High School | None in town | Ware Junior/Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3Lowest |
— | 11.1Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.