Compare towns
Epping vs Raymond vs Newton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has the most people working from home (24%).
Raymond has grown the fastest since 2010 (+30.9%).
Newton has the highest household income ($138k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Raymond | Newton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430Highest |
3,645Lowest |
4,836 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1% NH: +4.6% |
+30.9%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+4.7%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5Lowest 4% above NH |
47.7±13.3 10% above NH |
47.8±5.7Highest 10% above NH |
| Newton and Raymond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8Highest NH: 18.2% |
16.6%±7.4Lowest NH: 18.2% |
17.1%±4.3 NH: 18.2% |
| Epping and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2 NH: 20.1% |
25.2%±6.4Highest NH: 20.1% |
16%±3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Raymond and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37% NH: 40.6% |
24.1%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
37.9%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3 NH: 6% |
6.9%±4.2Highest NH: 6% |
4.7%±2.5Lowest NH: 6% |
| Raymond and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7k 5% above NH |
$73,066±$8kLowest 26% below NH |
$138,487±$29kHighest 40% above NH |
| Newton and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35k 9% above NH |
$314,900±$34kLowest 22% below NH |
$459,500±$18kHighest 14% above NH |
| Newton and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 17% above NH |
$994±$450Lowest 33% below NH |
$1,683±$96 13% above NH |
| Epping and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936 4% above NH |
$5,113Lowest 23% below NH |
$8,124Highest 22% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
27.6%±13.5Lowest NH: 48.2% |
62%±41.8 NH: 48.2% |
| Epping and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
7.1% NH: 7.2% |
7.5%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3% NH: 72.8% |
75%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
90.1%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 10 yrs newer than NH |
1978Lowest 1 yr older than NH |
1983 4 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 21% above NH |
31 min 14% above NH |
30 minLowest 13% above NH |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
12.8%±5.8Lowest NH: 16.8% |
18.1%±5.2 NH: 16.8% |
| Epping and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | #96 of 120 in NH | #70 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Epping School District | — | Sanborn Regional School District |
| High school in town | Epping High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.