Compare towns
Epping vs Lancaster vs Raymond
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has the most people working from home (24%).
Lancaster has the most affordable homes ($216k median).
Raymond has the youngest population (median age 43.4).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Lancaster | Raymond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430 |
3,216Lowest |
10,900Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1%Highest NH: +4.6% |
-8.2%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+5.4% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5 4% above NH |
45.5±6.9Highest 5% above NH |
43.4±3.8Lowest about the NH average |
| Lancaster and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8 NH: 18.2% |
20.9%±6.1Highest NH: 18.2% |
18%±3.6Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Lancaster and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2 NH: 20.1% |
28.4%±5.8Highest NH: 20.1% |
18%±3.3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Lancaster and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37%Highest NH: 40.6% |
30.1% NH: 40.6% |
26.4%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3Highest NH: 6% |
2.9%±2.2Lowest NH: 6% |
3.9%±1.7 NH: 6% |
| Epping and Raymond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7k 5% above NH |
$68,911±$23kLowest 30% below NH |
$104,597±$10kHighest 6% above NH |
| Raymond and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35kHighest 9% above NH |
$215,700±$24kLowest 46% below NH |
$370,400±$17k 8% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 17% above NH |
$1,019±$263Lowest 32% below NH |
$1,376±$196 8% below NH |
| Epping and Raymond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936Highest 4% above NH |
$4,226Lowest 37% below NH |
$6,146 8% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
36.1%±17 NH: 48.2% |
24.1%±11.9Lowest NH: 48.2% |
| Epping and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
16.7%Highest NH: 7.2% |
6.7% NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3%Highest NH: 72.8% |
75.1%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
85.8% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 10 yrs newer than NH |
1942Lowest 37 yrs older than NH |
1983 4 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 21% above NH |
23 minLowest 14% below NH |
30 min 12% above NH |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
11.5%±6.3 NH: 16.8% |
9.4%±3.5Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Epping and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | #107 of 120 in NH | #96 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Epping School District | White Mountains Regional School District | Raymond School District |
| High school in town | Epping High School | None in town | Raymond High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3Lowest |
— | 11.2Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.