Compare towns
Epping vs Highgate vs Proctor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Highgate has the most renters (19.3% rent).
Proctor has the shortest commute (22 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Highgate | Proctor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430Highest |
3,528 |
1,794Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-1.8%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5Highest 16% above U.S. |
44±7.4 13% above U.S. |
42.4±6.4Lowest 9% above U.S. |
| Epping and Highgate are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8 U.S.: 22% |
15.8%±5.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.8%±4.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Proctor and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.2%±5.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.4%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Epping and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
19.5%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
28.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.6%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.6%±1.7 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Epping and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7kHighest 29% above U.S. |
$81,017±$14k about the U.S. average |
$74,167±$12kLowest 8% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35kHighest 31% above U.S. |
$280,500±$21k 16% below U.S. |
$209,900±$17kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 23% above U.S. |
$895±$691Lowest 37% below U.S. |
$1,029±$202 27% below U.S. |
| Epping and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936Highest 122% above U.S. |
$3,558Lowest 14% above U.S. |
$4,032 29% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
30.5%±11.3Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
37.3%±16.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Epping and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.1% U.S.: 12.5% |
16.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
80.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
86.7%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 9 yrs newer than U.S. |
1980 same as U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 22% above U.S. |
31 min 17% above U.S. |
22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
14.9%±7.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Epping and Highgate are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | #43 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Epping School District | Missisquoi Valley School District #89 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 |
| High school in town | Epping High School | Missisquoi Valley Union High School | Proctor Junior/Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3 |
9.8Highest |
8.7Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.