Compare towns
Epping vs Haverhill vs Epsom
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Haverhill has the most affordable homes ($248k median).
Epsom has the shortest commute (31 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Haverhill | Epsom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430Highest |
4,611Lowest |
4,939 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1%Highest NH: +4.6% |
-2.4%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+5.9% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5Lowest 4% above NH |
49.7±10.6Highest 15% above NH |
47.1±3.4 9% above NH |
| Haverhill and Epsom are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8Highest NH: 18.2% |
14%±4.8Lowest NH: 18.2% |
18.2%±4.9 NH: 18.2% |
| Epping and Epsom are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2Highest NH: 20.1% |
21.3%±5.2 NH: 20.1% |
20.7%±3.3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Epping and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37% NH: 40.6% |
26.5%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
40.6%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3 NH: 6% |
5%±3.3Lowest NH: 6% |
5.2%±2.4Highest NH: 6% |
| Epsom and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7kHighest 5% above NH |
$85,929±$22kLowest 13% below NH |
$97,941±$13k about the NH average |
| Epping and Epsom are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35kHighest 9% above NH |
$247,900±$41kLowest 38% below NH |
$338,400±$19k 16% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 17% above NH |
$1,115±$84Lowest 25% below NH |
$1,212±$437 19% below NH |
| Epping and Epsom are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936Highest 4% above NH |
$5,908Lowest 11% below NH |
$6,210 7% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9 NH: 48.2% |
56.6%±26.6Lowest NH: 48.2% |
71.2%±19.7Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Epsom and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7% NH: 7.2% |
11.4%Highest NH: 7.2% |
3.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3% NH: 72.8% |
76.5%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
87.6%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 10 yrs newer than NH |
1975Lowest 4 yrs older than NH |
1986 7 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 21% above NH |
33 minHighest 22% above NH |
31 minLowest 15% above NH |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
4.7%±3.4Lowest NH: 16.8% |
13.1%±4.3 NH: 16.8% |
| Epping and Epsom are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | #95 of 120 in NH | #69 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Epping School District | Haverhill Cooperative School District | Epsom School District |
| High school in town | Epping High School | Woodsville High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3Lowest |
10.0Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.