Compare towns
Epping vs Dummerston vs South Hooksett
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Dummerston has the most affordable homes ($335k median).
South Hooksett has the highest household income ($130k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Epping | Dummerston | South Hooksett |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,430Highest |
2,090Lowest |
5,902 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +11.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+0.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+8.7% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 45.1±3.5 16% above U.S. |
45.6±11.7Highest 17% above U.S. |
35.2±3.6Lowest 10% below U.S. |
| Dummerston and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±4.8 U.S.: 22% |
21.7%±6Highest U.S.: 22% |
16.3%±3.9Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Dummerston and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.6%±5.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
24.3%±3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
13.5%±2.6Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Dummerston and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
58.7%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
37.9% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.1%±3.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
1.3%±1.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
14.3%±0.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $104,220±$7k 29% above U.S. |
$101,696±$21kLowest 26% above U.S. |
$130,000±$15kHighest 61% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $436,900±$35kHighest 31% above U.S. |
$335,300±$22kLowest about the U.S. average |
$433,200±$40k 30% above U.S. |
| Epping and South Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,742±$576Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,392±$126Lowest about the U.S. average |
$1,471±$217 4% above U.S. |
| Epping and South Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,936Highest 122% above U.S. |
$4,536Lowest 45% above U.S. |
$6,801 118% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 67.8%±25.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
44.1%±32.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
36.1%±25Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Epping and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4.5% U.S.: 12.5% |
4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
92.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
82.9%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1989Highest 9 yrs newer than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1985 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 22% above U.S. |
21 minLowest 21% below U.S. |
26 min about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 24%±6.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
25.9%±10.3Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
7.1%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Dummerston and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #77 of 120 in NH | — | — |
| School district | Epping School District | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 | — |
| High school in town | Epping High School | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.3 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.