Compare towns
Enosburgh vs Windsor vs Salisbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Enosburgh has the youngest population (median age 40.6).
Windsor has the most renters (42.2% rent).
Salisbury has the highest household income ($100k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Enosburgh | Windsor | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,804 |
3,554Highest |
1,200Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +0.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+7.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.6±3.9Lowest 6% below VT |
44.8±6.5 4% above VT |
50.6±6.5Highest 17% above VT |
| Salisbury and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21%±4.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
16.6%±3.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Enosburgh and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.9%±3.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.7%±6.9 VT: 21.4% |
30.4%±2.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Salisbury and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
39.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
34.6% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
1.6%±1.1 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $63,828±$17k 21% below VT |
$52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
$99,688±$21kHighest 23% above VT |
| Salisbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $223,100±$39k 30% below VT |
$207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
$306,900±$51kHighest 3% below VT |
| Salisbury and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,026±$89 17% below VT |
$1,443±$984Highest 17% above VT |
| Salisbury and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,624Lowest 28% below VT |
$5,209Highest 3% above VT |
$4,842 4% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.9%±11.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.5%±17Lowest VT: 48.4% |
31.9%±22.6 VT: 48.4% |
| Enosburgh and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.8% VT: 10.1% |
4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.7% VT: 73.2% |
57.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
88.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972Highest 4 yrs older than VT |
1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
1967 9 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 36% above VT |
23 min 3% below VT |
19 minLowest 20% below VT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±4.4 VT: 16.9% |
10.3%±5Highest VT: 16.9% |
6%±2.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Windsor and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #26 of 70 in VT | #61 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | — | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 |
| High school in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | 12 photos → | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.