Compare towns
Enosburgh vs Swanton vs Underhill
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Enosburgh has the oldest population (median age 40.6).
Swanton has the shortest commute (21 min average).
Underhill has the most expensive homes ($446k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Enosburgh | Swanton | Underhill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,804 |
2,670Lowest |
3,141Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | -2.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+3.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.6±3.9Highest 6% below VT |
37.8±4.7Lowest 12% below VT |
38.1±11.4 12% below VT |
| Enosburgh and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.3%±8.1 VT: 17.9% |
27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.9%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
19.3%±2.7Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Swanton and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
20.2% VT: 43.8% |
50.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.7Lowest VT: 7% |
3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
| Enosburgh and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $63,828±$17kLowest 21% below VT |
$66,607±$27k 18% below VT |
$92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
| Underhill and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $223,100±$39kLowest 30% below VT |
$229,000±$15k 28% below VT |
$446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,238±$103Highest about the VT average |
— |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,624Lowest 28% below VT |
$4,370 13% below VT |
$6,697Highest 33% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.9%±11.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
36.1%±21.6 VT: 48.4% |
0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Enosburgh and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13.9% VT: 10.1% |
20.1%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.7% VT: 73.2% |
64.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1952Lowest 24 yrs older than VT |
1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 36% above VT |
21 minLowest 9% below VT |
33 minHighest 39% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±4.4 VT: 16.9% |
7.4%±4.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
19.4%±11.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Underhill and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #26 of 70 in VT | — | #2 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | — | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.