Compare towns
Enfield vs Epping vs Haverhill
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Enfield has the oldest population (median age 58.3).
Epping has the most people working from home (24%).
Haverhill has the most renters (37.2% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Enfield | Epping | Haverhill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,475Lowest |
7,430 |
67,698Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+11.1% U.S.: +7.4% |
+11.3%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 58.3±5.4Highest 50% above U.S. |
45.1±3.5 16% above U.S. |
39.4±1.1Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Kids under 18 | 7.9%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 22% |
18.7%±4.8 U.S.: 22% |
21.3%±1.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Haverhill and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 30.7%±7.6Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.6%±5.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
15.5%±1.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Enfield and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 43%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
37% U.S.: 35.7% |
32.6%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.7%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.1%±3.3Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.5%±0.6 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Epping and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $95,474±$19k 18% above U.S. |
$104,220±$7kHighest 29% above U.S. |
$88,326±$4kLowest 9% above U.S. |
| Epping and Enfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,800±$71kLowest 17% above U.S. |
$436,900±$35k 31% above U.S. |
$453,900±$9kHighest 36% above U.S. |
| Haverhill and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,181±$563Lowest 16% below U.S. |
$1,742±$576Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,668±$49 18% above U.S. |
| Epping and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,203 99% above U.S. |
$6,936Highest 122% above U.S. |
$4,772Lowest 53% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 17.8%±16.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
67.8%±25.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
60.2%±5.3 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Epping and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
11.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.1% U.S.: 65.2% |
86.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
62.8%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1989Highest 9 yrs newer than U.S. |
1964Lowest 16 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 24 minLowest 10% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 22% above U.S. |
27 min 4% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 11%±5.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
24%±6.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
12.5%±1.5 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #5 of 120 in NH | #77 of 120 in NH | #243 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Mascoma Valley Regional School District | Epping School District | Haverhill · Whittier Regional Vocational Technical |
| High school in town | None in town | Epping High School | Haverhill High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.3Lowest |
12.5Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.