Compare towns
Effingham vs Salisbury vs New Durham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Effingham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+15.4%).
Salisbury has the most people working from home (23.3%).
New Durham has the youngest population (median age 46.5).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Effingham | Salisbury | New Durham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,912 |
1,609Lowest |
2,748Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +15.4%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+2.9% NH: +4.6% |
+2.1%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 46.9±12.4 8% above NH |
51.5±4.5Highest 19% above NH |
46.5±7.5Lowest 7% above NH |
| Salisbury and Effingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.5%±4.5 NH: 18.2% |
20.1%±9.6Highest NH: 18.2% |
14.8%±5.6Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Salisbury and Effingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.7%±2.5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
24.9%±4Highest NH: 20.1% |
23.8%±4 NH: 20.1% |
| Salisbury and New Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.3%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
37.3%Highest NH: 40.6% |
34.7% NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.1%±0.8 NH: 6% |
2%±1.1Highest NH: 6% |
1%±0.7Lowest NH: 6% |
| Salisbury and Effingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,607±$14kLowest 23% below NH |
$111,591±$17kHighest 13% above NH |
$100,194±$13k about the NH average |
| Salisbury and New Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $322,700±$30kLowest 20% below NH |
$363,400±$47kHighest 10% below NH |
$339,400±$27k 16% below NH |
| Salisbury and New Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,090±$121Lowest 27% below NH |
$1,917±$632Highest 29% above NH |
$1,417±$116 5% below NH |
| Salisbury and New Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,163Lowest 23% below NH |
$5,859Highest 12% below NH |
$5,774 13% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 13.6%±40.4 NH: 48.2% |
0%±100Lowest NH: 48.2% |
25%±42.7Highest NH: 48.2% |
| New Durham and Effingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9%Highest NH: 7.2% |
7.1% NH: 7.2% |
5.8%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 90.2%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
96.9%Highest NH: 72.8% |
94% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Lowest 3 yrs newer than NH |
1982Lowest 3 yrs newer than NH |
1983Highest 4 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minLowest 18% above NH |
32 min 20% above NH |
35 minHighest 30% above NH |
| Work from home | 16.1%±4.2 NH: 16.8% |
23.3%±10.6Highest NH: 16.8% |
10%±4.1Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Salisbury and Effingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Governor Wentworth Regional School District | Merrimack Valley School District | Governor Wentworth Regional School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.