Compare towns
Duxbury vs Fayston vs Winhall
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Duxbury has the most affordable homes ($365k median).
Fayston has the most people working from home (26.2%).
Winhall has grown the fastest since 2010 (+53.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Duxbury | Fayston | Winhall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,548Highest |
1,342 |
752Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.7% VT: +2.8% |
+0.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+53.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 37.5±4.4Lowest 13% below VT |
46.9±3.5 9% above VT |
48.9±6.1Highest 13% above VT |
| Winhall and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.8%±3.5 VT: 17.9% |
19.3%±3.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
17%±6.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Fayston and Duxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 13%±2.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
19.6%±3.8 VT: 21.4% |
20.6%±5.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Winhall and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 58.5%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
66.9% VT: 43.8% |
67.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.5%±3.3Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±1.8Lowest VT: 7% |
3.1%±4Lowest VT: 7% |
| Duxbury and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $105,208±$25k 30% above VT |
$110,250±$28kHighest 36% above VT |
$95,500±$23kLowest 18% above VT |
| Fayston and Duxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $364,600±$27kLowest 15% above VT |
$502,400±$82kHighest 59% above VT |
$471,800±$55k 49% above VT |
| Fayston and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,318±$407 7% above VT |
$1,654±$274Highest 34% above VT |
$1,094±$732Lowest 11% below VT |
| Fayston and Duxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,564Lowest 30% above VT |
$6,689Highest 33% above VT |
$6,567 30% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 21.2%±21 VT: 48.4% |
6.3%±27.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
37.5%±38.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Winhall and Duxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 2.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
4.2% VT: 10.1% |
5.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.4% VT: 73.2% |
87%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.5%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1988Highest 12 yrs newer than VT |
1977Lowest 1 yr newer than VT |
1982 6 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 minLowest about the VT average |
29 minHighest 25% above VT |
27 min 13% above VT |
| Work from home | 18.6%±3.6 VT: 16.9% |
26.2%±5.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.4%±9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Fayston and Duxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 | — |
| High school in town | Harwood Union Middle/High School | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.6 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.