Compare towns

Dover vs Randolph vs Underhill vs Newfane

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Dover has grown the fastest since 2010 (+60%).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Underhill has the most kids (27.8% under 18).
Newfane has the most people working from home (30.8%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureDoverRandolphUnderhillNewfane
People
Population
1,466
4,843Highest
3,141
1,456Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+60%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
+3.7%
VT: +2.8%
-4.7%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
Median age
53.5±8.3
24% above VT
40.4±7.4
6% below VT
38.1±11.4Lowest
12% below VT
54.4±3.9Highest
26% above VT
Newfane and Dover are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
10.2%±5.7Lowest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4
VT: 17.9%
27.8%±10.9Highest
VT: 17.9%
11.1%±3.7
VT: 17.9%
Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
29.5%±6.2Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
17.6%±6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
29.2%±3.9
VT: 21.4%
Dover and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
48.9%
VT: 43.8%
40.8%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
50.1%Highest
VT: 43.8%
46.5%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.5%±2.9
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
3.5%±2
VT: 7%
2.4%±2.1Lowest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$52,313±$7kLowest
36% below VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$92,267±$54kHighest
14% above VT
$66,719±$21k
18% below VT
Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$332,900±$55k
5% above VT
$278,700±$38kLowest
12% below VT
$446,000±$24kHighest
41% above VT
$284,200±$49k
10% below VT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$670±$49Lowest
46% below VT
$1,172±$173
5% below VT
—
$1,266±$238Highest
about the VT average
Newfane and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,510Lowest
10% below VT
$4,698
7% below VT
$6,697Highest
33% above VT
$5,174
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
38.1%±17.2
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
0%±18.2Lowest
VT: 48.4%
51.9%±79.7
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
7.3%
VT: 10.1%
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
6.4%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
10.9%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
81.1%
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
79.8%
VT: 73.2%
87.2%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1984Highest
8 yrs newer than VT
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1979
3 yrs newer than VT
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
22 min
6% below VT
21 minLowest
12% below VT
33 minHighest
39% above VT
27 min
13% above VT
Work from home
23.2%±11.1
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7Lowest
VT: 16.9%
19.4%±11.3
VT: 16.9%
30.8%±12.5Highest
VT: 16.9%
Newfane and Dover are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #55 of 70 in VT #2 of 70 in VT —
School district River Valleys Unified School District #73 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 West River Valley Union Education District #72A
High school in town None in town Randolph Union High School None in town None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.