Compare towns
Deerfield vs Haverhill vs Lee
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Deerfield has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.7%).
Haverhill has the most affordable homes ($248k median).
Lee has the most renters (28.9% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Deerfield | Haverhill | Lee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,158 |
4,611Lowest |
5,719Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-2.4% U.S.: +7.4% |
-2.6%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 51.8±3.6 33% above U.S. |
49.7±10.6Lowest 28% above U.S. |
55.2±5.8Highest 42% above U.S. |
| Lee and Deerfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.2%±3.7 U.S.: 22% |
14%±4.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
12.6%±5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Haverhill and Deerfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
21.3%±5.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
33.4%±6.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 44.4%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
26.5%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
44.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.9%±3.4Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
5%±3.3Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Deerfield and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $106,136±$14kHighest 31% above U.S. |
$85,929±$22k 6% above U.S. |
$83,750±$13kLowest 4% above U.S. |
| Deerfield and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $414,900±$37kHighest 25% above U.S. |
$247,900±$41kLowest 25% below U.S. |
$352,700±$19k 6% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,334±$318 6% below U.S. |
$1,115±$84Lowest 21% below U.S. |
$1,375±$212Highest about the U.S. average |
| Lee and Deerfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,824 87% above U.S. |
$5,908Highest 89% above U.S. |
$3,980Lowest 28% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 26.1%±15.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
56.6%±26.6 U.S.: 51.1% |
57.3%±21.2Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lee and Haverhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.8% U.S.: 12.5% |
11.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.2%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 78.4%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
76.5% U.S.: 65.2% |
71.1%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 8 yrs older than U.S. |
1975Highest 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1959Lowest 21 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 18 minLowest 33% below U.S. |
33 minHighest 23% above U.S. |
18 min 31% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 17.5%±6.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
4.7%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
16.4%±7.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Deerfield and Lee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #156 of 282 in MA | #95 of 120 in NH | #209 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Deerfield · Frontier | Haverhill Cooperative School District | Lee |
| High school in town | Frontier Regional | Woodsville High School | Lee Middle/High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1Highest |
10.0 |
9.2Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.