Compare towns

Danby vs Randolph vs Washington

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Danby has the highest household income ($77k).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Washington has the most affordable homes ($218k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureDanbyRandolphWashington
People
Population
1,133
4,843Highest
1,056Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-2.1%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.7%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
52.6±4.8
22% above VT
40.4±7.4Lowest
6% below VT
52.9±5.1Highest
23% above VT
Washington and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
14.6%±3.4Lowest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
16.5%±4.2
VT: 17.9%
Randolph and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
24.3%±2.6Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2Lowest
VT: 21.4%
24.3%±4.6Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
34.8%
VT: 43.8%
40.8%Highest
VT: 43.8%
31%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.5%±1.9Lowest
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
2.7%±2
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$77,321±$13kHighest
5% below VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$66,103±$8kLowest
19% below VT
Danby and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$272,400±$41k
14% below VT
$278,700±$38kHighest
12% below VT
$217,700±$37kLowest
31% below VT
Randolph and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$794±$166Lowest
36% below VT
$1,172±$173Highest
5% below VT
$996±$285
19% below VT
Randolph and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,543
10% below VT
$4,698Highest
7% below VT
$3,485Lowest
31% below VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
41.4%±34.6
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
34.5%±63.6Lowest
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
9.4%Highest
VT: 10.1%
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
3.2%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
89.3%
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
94.4%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1980
4 yrs newer than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
30 min
26% above VT
21 minLowest
12% below VT
31 minHighest
31% above VT
Work from home
12.1%±5.1Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
14.9%±5.7Highest
VT: 16.9%
Washington and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #55 of 70 in VT —
School district Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Echo Valley Community Union School District #67
High school in town None in town Randolph Union High School None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in Our Story None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.