Compare towns
Danby vs Randolph vs Jericho
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Danby has the oldest population (median age 52.6).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Jericho has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Danby | Randolph | Jericho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,133Lowest |
4,843 |
5,114Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+1.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 52.6±4.8Highest 22% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
49.7±5.1 15% above VT |
| Danby and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Jericho and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.3%±2.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Danby and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
65.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.5%±1.9 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $77,321±$13k 5% below VT |
$76,758±$6kLowest 5% below VT |
$116,923±$16kHighest 44% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $272,400±$41kLowest 14% below VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$493,100±$38kHighest 56% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
$1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$1,731±$111Highest 40% above VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,543Lowest 10% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$7,318Highest 45% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.4%±34.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 89.3% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minHighest 26% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
26 min 10% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.1%±5.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Jericho and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | #6 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | Mt. Mansfield Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4Lowest |
13.0Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.