Compare towns
Cornish vs Windham vs New Gloucester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Cornish has the oldest population (median age 54).
Windham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.4%).
New Gloucester has the most kids (24.2% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Cornish | Windham | New Gloucester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,816Lowest |
19,188Highest |
5,766 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+8.4%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2.4% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 54±8.3Highest 39% above U.S. |
41.8±1.8 7% above U.S. |
40.1±5.5Lowest 3% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 14.4%±3.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±2.7 U.S.: 22% |
24.2%±5.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
| New Gloucester and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.3%±4.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
15.9%±2.1 U.S.: 17.2% |
15.4%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.6% U.S.: 35.7% |
44.2%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
30.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.4%±0.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.9%±1.1Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.3%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Windham and New Gloucester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $91,821±$2kLowest 14% above U.S. |
$107,934±$14k 34% above U.S. |
$108,797±$12kHighest 35% above U.S. |
| New Gloucester and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $296,000±$69kLowest 11% below U.S. |
$388,900±$22kHighest 17% above U.S. |
$357,100±$29k 7% above U.S. |
| Windham and New Gloucester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,221±$227 14% below U.S. |
$1,232±$332Highest 13% below U.S. |
$1,150±$249Lowest 19% below U.S. |
| Windham and Cornish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,796Highest 86% above U.S. |
$3,938 26% above U.S. |
$3,417Lowest 10% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.5%±38.1Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
32.7%±14.7 U.S.: 51.1% |
24.7%±12Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Cornish and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.7%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
4.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
84.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
82.9%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1980Lowest same as U.S. |
1985 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
1991Highest 11 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 24 minLowest 8% below U.S. |
26 min about the U.S. average |
27 minHighest about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 12%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
19%±4.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
14.2%±6.5 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Windham and New Gloucester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #95 of 133 in ME | #65 of 133 in ME |
| School district | Cornish School District | RSU 14 | RSU 15/MSAD 15 |
| High school in town | None in town | Windham High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 12.1 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.