Compare towns
Conesville vs Hubbardton vs Windham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Conesville has the most affordable homes ($214k median).
Hubbardton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.1%).
Windham has the shortest commute (27 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Conesville | Hubbardton | Windham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 750Lowest |
831 |
1,432Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+0.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50±8.1 29% above U.S. |
48±13.6Lowest 23% above U.S. |
56.5±5.1Highest 45% above U.S. |
| Windham and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.1%±4.8 U.S.: 22% |
19.4%±6.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
11.1%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Hubbardton and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28%±2.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
32.1%±10.7Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
31.4%±5.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Hubbardton and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
43.2% U.S.: 35.7% |
43.8%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±2.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
1.2%±0.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
6.6%±5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Windham and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,000±$14kLowest 8% below U.S. |
$102,321±$18kHighest 27% above U.S. |
$76,477±$17k 5% below U.S. |
| Hubbardton and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $214,300±$31kLowest 36% below U.S. |
$293,800±$42k 12% below U.S. |
$315,600±$74kHighest 5% below U.S. |
| Windham and Hubbardton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $892±$296 37% below U.S. |
$1,708±$259Highest 21% above U.S. |
$850±$295Lowest 40% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,500 12% above U.S. |
$5,284Highest 69% above U.S. |
$3,363Lowest 8% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 60%±100 U.S.: 51.1% |
55.6%±100Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
68.9%±35.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Windham and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.4% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
94.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
89%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 1 yr newer than U.S. |
1973Lowest 7 yrs older than U.S. |
1985Highest 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 42 minHighest 58% above U.S. |
33 min 27% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 13.6%±6.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
24%±17.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
17.1%±6.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Hubbardton and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.