Compare towns
Conesville vs Highgate vs Proctor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Conesville has the oldest population (median age 50).
Highgate has the most expensive homes ($281k median).
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Conesville | Highgate | Proctor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 750Lowest |
3,528Highest |
1,794 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
-1.8% U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.3%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50±8.1Highest 29% above U.S. |
44±7.4 13% above U.S. |
42.4±6.4Lowest 9% above U.S. |
| Conesville and Highgate are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.1%±4.8Lowest U.S.: 22% |
15.8%±5.3 U.S.: 22% |
21.8%±4.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Proctor and Highgate are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28%±2.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.2%±5.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.4%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
19.5%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
28.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±2.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.6%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.6%±1.7Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Proctor and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,000±$14kLowest 8% below U.S. |
$81,017±$14kHighest about the U.S. average |
$74,167±$12k 8% below U.S. |
| Highgate and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $214,300±$31k 36% below U.S. |
$280,500±$21kHighest 16% below U.S. |
$209,900±$17kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $892±$296Lowest 37% below U.S. |
$895±$691 37% below U.S. |
$1,029±$202Highest 27% below U.S. |
| Proctor and Highgate are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,500Lowest 12% above U.S. |
$3,558 14% above U.S. |
$4,032Highest 29% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 60%±100Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
30.5%±11.3Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
37.3%±16.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Conesville and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
8.1%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
16.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
80.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
86.7% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 1 yr newer than U.S. |
1980 same as U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 42 minHighest 58% above U.S. |
31 min 17% above U.S. |
22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 13.6%±6.6 U.S.: 15.1% |
14.9%±7.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Highgate and Conesville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #43 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Missisquoi Valley School District #89 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 |
| High school in town | — | Missisquoi Valley Union High School | Proctor Junior/Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.8Highest |
8.7Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.