Compare towns
Concord vs Randolph vs Topsham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Concord has the most affordable homes ($159k median).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Topsham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Concord | Randolph | Topsham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,145 |
4,843Highest |
999Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -7.6%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+2.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 49.8±6.6 16% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
50.1±5.9Highest 16% above VT |
| Topsham and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.9%±3.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
18%±3.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Topsham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.1%±4Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
23.2%±4.8 VT: 21.4% |
| Concord and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
28.1% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.2%±2.1 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.7%±1.3Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $73,304±$9k 10% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$72,308±$60kLowest 11% below VT |
| Randolph and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $159,300±$8kLowest 50% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$222,900±$56k 30% below VT |
| Randolph and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,111±$29 10% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$908±$398Lowest 26% below VT |
| Randolph and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,026Lowest 40% below VT |
$4,698Highest 7% below VT |
$4,006 21% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43.3%±82.4Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
91.9%±28.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Topsham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13.2% VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
18.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.6%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
90.3% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1977 1 yr newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min 13% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
35 minHighest 49% above VT |
| Work from home | 8.7%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
14.2%±5.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Topsham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Waits River Union High District #36 |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.