Compare towns
Clinton vs Mansfield vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Clinton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+13.4%).
Mansfield has the most kids (22.4% under 18).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Clinton | Mansfield | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,563 |
23,931Highest |
8,606Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +13.4%Highest MA: +7.4% |
+2.9%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+4.8% MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.6±2.7Lowest 4% below MA |
41.4±1.3 4% above MA |
43.1±4.9Highest 8% above MA |
| Lancaster and Mansfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.8%±2.5Lowest MA: 19.4% |
22.4%±2.4Highest MA: 19.4% |
19.2%±4 MA: 19.4% |
| Mansfield and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.5%±2.8Lowest MA: 17.9% |
15.4%±2 MA: 17.9% |
19.9%±4.2Highest MA: 17.9% |
| Lancaster and Mansfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 36.6%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
51.1%Highest MA: 47.3% |
50.3% MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±2Highest MA: 7.9% |
5.5%±1.3 MA: 7.9% |
3%±1.8Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Clinton and Mansfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,781±$10kLowest 14% below MA |
$125,273±$15k 21% above MA |
$134,833±$27kHighest 30% above MA |
| Lancaster and Mansfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $387,300±$19kLowest 31% below MA |
$603,500±$28kHighest 7% above MA |
$519,100±$60k 8% below MA |
| Mansfield and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,402±$76Lowest 20% below MA |
$1,803±$147 about the MA average |
$2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
| Lancaster and Mansfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,654Lowest 22% below MA |
$7,226 21% above MA |
$7,235Highest 21% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.3%±6.4 MA: 51.8% |
38.2%±8.5Lowest MA: 51.8% |
68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6%Highest MA: 10% |
4.7% MA: 10% |
1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 54.7%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
73.1% MA: 62.5% |
85.1%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1956Lowest 8 yrs older than MA |
1980Highest 16 yrs newer than MA |
1971 7 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minLowest about the MA average |
33 minHighest 13% above MA |
32 min 9% above MA |
| Work from home | 14.2%±4.2Lowest MA: 18.6% |
20%±3.4 MA: 18.6% |
33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #246 of 282 in MA | #60 of 282 in MA | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Clinton | Mansfield | Nashoba |
| High school in town | Clinton Senior High | Mansfield High | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.8Highest |
11.1Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.