Compare towns
Clinton vs Lee vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Clinton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+13.4%).
Lee has the shortest commute (18 min average).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Clinton | Lee | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,563Highest |
5,719Lowest |
8,606 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +13.4%Highest MA: +7.4% |
-2.6%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+4.8% MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.6±2.7Lowest 4% below MA |
55.2±5.8Highest 38% above MA |
43.1±4.9 8% above MA |
| Kids under 18 | 17.8%±2.5 MA: 19.4% |
12.6%±5Lowest MA: 19.4% |
19.2%±4Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Lancaster and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.5%±2.8Lowest MA: 17.9% |
33.4%±6.1Highest MA: 17.9% |
19.9%±4.2 MA: 17.9% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 36.6%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
44.1% MA: 47.3% |
50.3%Highest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±2Highest MA: 7.9% |
5%±2.1 MA: 7.9% |
3%±1.8Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Clinton and Lee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,781±$10k 14% below MA |
$83,750±$13kLowest 19% below MA |
$134,833±$27kHighest 30% above MA |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $387,300±$19k 31% below MA |
$352,700±$19kLowest 37% below MA |
$519,100±$60kHighest 8% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,402±$76 20% below MA |
$1,375±$212Lowest 22% below MA |
$2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,654 22% below MA |
$3,980Lowest 34% below MA |
$7,235Highest 21% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.3%±6.4Lowest MA: 51.8% |
57.3%±21.2 MA: 51.8% |
68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Lee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6%Highest MA: 10% |
7.2% MA: 10% |
1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 54.7%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
71.1% MA: 62.5% |
85.1%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1956Lowest 8 yrs older than MA |
1959 5 yrs older than MA |
1971Highest 7 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min about the MA average |
18 minLowest 38% below MA |
32 minHighest 9% above MA |
| Work from home | 14.2%±4.2Lowest MA: 18.6% |
16.4%±7.8 MA: 18.6% |
33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #246 of 282 in MA | #209 of 282 in MA | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Clinton | Lee | Nashoba |
| High school in town | Clinton Senior High | Lee Middle/High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.8Highest |
9.2Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.