Compare towns
Clinton vs Lancaster vs Warren
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Clinton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+13.4%).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
Warren has the most affordable homes ($334k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Clinton | Lancaster | Warren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,563Highest |
8,606 |
5,009Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +13.4%Highest MA: +7.4% |
+4.8% MA: +7.4% |
-3.1%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.6±2.7Lowest 4% below MA |
43.1±4.9Highest 8% above MA |
38.7±7.3 3% below MA |
| Lancaster and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.8%±2.5Lowest MA: 19.4% |
19.2%±4 MA: 19.4% |
20.8%±8Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Warren and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.5%±2.8Lowest MA: 17.9% |
19.9%±4.2Highest MA: 17.9% |
14.6%±4.5 MA: 17.9% |
| Lancaster and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 36.6% MA: 47.3% |
50.3%Highest MA: 47.3% |
23.2%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±2Highest MA: 7.9% |
3%±1.8 MA: 7.9% |
2.9%±2.1Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,781±$10k 14% below MA |
$134,833±$27kHighest 30% above MA |
$66,082±$6kLowest 36% below MA |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $387,300±$19k 31% below MA |
$519,100±$60kHighest 8% below MA |
$333,700±$35kLowest 41% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,402±$76 20% below MA |
$2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
$890±$174Lowest 49% below MA |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,654 22% below MA |
$7,235Highest 21% above MA |
$4,530Lowest 24% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.3%±6.4 MA: 51.8% |
68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
29.7%±18.4Lowest MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6% MA: 10% |
1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
9%Highest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 54.7%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
85.1%Highest MA: 62.5% |
64.5% MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1956Lowest 8 yrs older than MA |
1971 7 yrs newer than MA |
1975Highest 11 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minLowest about the MA average |
32 min 9% above MA |
33 minHighest 13% above MA |
| Work from home | 14.2%±4.2 MA: 18.6% |
33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
8.5%±5.4Lowest MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #246 of 282 in MA | #145 of 282 in MA | #165 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Clinton | Nashoba | Quaboag Regional |
| High school in town | Clinton Senior High | None in town | Quaboag Regional High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.8Highest |
— | 10.0Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.