Compare towns

Clinton vs Killingly vs Warren vs Lancaster

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Clinton has the most renters (45.3% rent).
Killingly has the most affordable homes ($289k median).
Warren has the most kids (20.8% under 18).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureClintonKillinglyWarrenLancaster
People
Population
15,563
17,867Highest
5,009Lowest
8,606
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+13.4%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
-3.1%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+4.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
38.6±2.7Lowest
about the U.S. average
39.5±3
about the U.S. average
38.7±7.3
about the U.S. average
43.1±4.9Highest
11% above U.S.
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
17.8%±2.5Lowest
U.S.: 22%
19.8%±2.3
U.S.: 22%
20.8%±8Highest
U.S.: 22%
19.2%±4
U.S.: 22%
Warren and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
14.5%±2.8Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
19.7%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
14.6%±4.5
U.S.: 17.2%
19.9%±4.2Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
36.6%
U.S.: 35.7%
22.9%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
23.2%
U.S.: 35.7%
50.3%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
6.9%±2Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
5.4%±1.9
U.S.: 6.4%
2.9%±2.1Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
3%±1.8
U.S.: 6.4%
Clinton and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$89,781±$10k
11% above U.S.
$84,350±$8k
4% above U.S.
$66,082±$6kLowest
18% below U.S.
$134,833±$27kHighest
67% above U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$387,300±$19k
16% above U.S.
$288,600±$15kLowest
13% below U.S.
$333,700±$35k
about the U.S. average
$519,100±$60kHighest
56% above U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,402±$76
about the U.S. average
$1,044±$141
26% below U.S.
$890±$174Lowest
37% below U.S.
$2,338±$539Highest
65% above U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,654
49% above U.S.
$3,922Lowest
26% above U.S.
$4,530
45% above U.S.
$7,235Highest
132% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
40.3%±6.4
U.S.: 51.1%
42.8%±10.9
U.S.: 51.1%
29.7%±18.4Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
68.3%±36.7Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
8.6%
U.S.: 12.5%
11.4%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
9%
U.S.: 12.5%
1.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
54.7%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
71.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
64.5%
U.S.: 65.2%
85.1%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1956Lowest
24 yrs older than U.S.
1968
12 yrs older than U.S.
1975Highest
5 yrs older than U.S.
1971
9 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
30 min
13% above U.S.
28 minLowest
6% above U.S.
33 minHighest
25% above U.S.
32 min
20% above U.S.
Work from home
14.2%±4.2
U.S.: 15.1%
11.1%±2.3
U.S.: 15.1%
8.5%±5.4Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
33.6%±9.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #246 of 282 in MA #136 of 149 in CT #165 of 282 in MA #145 of 282 in MA
School district Clinton Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Quaboag Regional Nashoba
High school in town Clinton Senior High Killingly High School Quaboag Regional High None in town
Students per teacherat that high school
12.8Highest
11.1
10.0Lowest
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.