Compare towns

Clinton vs Gardner vs Webster vs Easthampton

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Clinton has the highest household income ($90k).
Gardner has the most affordable homes ($302k median).
Webster has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Easthampton has the most people working from home (19%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureClintonGardnerWebsterEasthampton
People
Population
15,563
21,148Highest
12,228Lowest
16,086
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+13.4%Highest
MA: +7.4%
+5.2%Lowest
MA: +7.4%
+6.9%
MA: +7.4%
—
Median age
38.6±2.7
4% below MA
43.7±2.3
9% above MA
37.2±2.1Lowest
7% below MA
46±2.6Highest
15% above MA
Easthampton and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
17.8%±2.5
MA: 19.4%
18.3%±2.3
MA: 19.4%
21.8%±3.6Highest
MA: 19.4%
15.5%±2.4Lowest
MA: 19.4%
Webster and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
14.5%±2.8Lowest
MA: 17.9%
19.6%±2.2
MA: 17.9%
15.7%±2.5
MA: 17.9%
23.9%±3Highest
MA: 17.9%
Easthampton and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
36.6%
MA: 47.3%
23.8%
MA: 47.3%
18.8%Lowest
MA: 47.3%
38%Highest
MA: 47.3%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
6.9%±2Highest
MA: 7.9%
4.6%±1.3Lowest
MA: 7.9%
6%±1.8
MA: 7.9%
6.1%±1.9
MA: 7.9%
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$89,781±$10kHighest
14% below MA
$67,518±$8k
35% below MA
$63,837±$8kLowest
39% below MA
$71,673±$7k
31% below MA
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$387,300±$19kHighest
31% below MA
$301,600±$20kLowest
46% below MA
$333,100±$14k
41% below MA
$371,500±$15k
34% below MA
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,402±$76Highest
20% below MA
$1,109±$51Lowest
37% below MA
$1,198±$85
32% below MA
$1,292±$70
27% below MA
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,654
22% below MA
$4,150
31% below MA
$3,234Lowest
46% below MA
$4,932Highest
18% below MA
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
40.3%±6.4Lowest
MA: 51.8%
49.7%±8.6Highest
MA: 51.8%
46.1%±7.4
MA: 51.8%
45.5%±10.7
MA: 51.8%
Gardner and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
8.6%
MA: 10%
13.7%
MA: 10%
16%Highest
MA: 10%
8%Lowest
MA: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
54.7%
MA: 62.5%
58.9%Highest
MA: 62.5%
45.5%Lowest
MA: 62.5%
58.4%
MA: 62.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1956
8 yrs older than MA
1954Lowest
10 yrs older than MA
1954Lowest
10 yrs older than MA
1966Highest
2 yrs newer than MA
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
30 min
about the MA average
31 minHighest
5% above MA
28 min
5% below MA
22 minLowest
23% below MA
Work from home
14.2%±4.2
MA: 18.6%
13.3%±3.6
MA: 18.6%
7.1%±2.9Lowest
MA: 18.6%
19%±3.2Highest
MA: 18.6%
Easthampton and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #246 of 282 in MA #273 of 282 in MA #271 of 282 in MA #92 of 282 in MA
School district Clinton Gardner — Easthampton
High school in town Clinton Senior High Gardner High — Easthampton High
Students per teacherat that high school
12.8
13.5Highest
—
9.8Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.