Compare towns
Clarendon vs Middlesex vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Clarendon has the shortest commute (16 min average).
Middlesex has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.8%).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Clarendon | Middlesex | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,460 |
1,943Lowest |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+2.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 52.3±4.1Highest 21% above VT |
44.4±3.9 3% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
| Clarendon and Middlesex are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.6%±5.1 VT: 17.9% |
21.3%±3.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Middlesex and Clarendon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.4%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
20.6%±3.7Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Clarendon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 25.5%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
54.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.1%±1Lowest VT: 7% |
5.2%±2.6 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $59,609±$12kLowest 27% below VT |
$109,632±$13kHighest 35% above VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $220,900±$32kLowest 30% below VT |
$376,300±$40kHighest 19% above VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,096±$305Lowest 11% below VT |
$1,333±$359Highest 8% above VT |
$1,172±$173 5% below VT |
| Middlesex and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,740Lowest 26% below VT |
$6,483Highest 29% above VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.4%±27.1 VT: 48.4% |
0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Clarendon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6% VT: 10.1% |
3.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.3% VT: 73.2% |
96.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1986Highest 10 yrs newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 16 minLowest 33% below VT |
27 minHighest 17% above VT |
21 min 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 9.1%±4.4Lowest VT: 16.9% |
28.4%±10.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mill River Unified Union School District #52 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | Mill River Union High School | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4 |
— | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.