Compare towns

Chilmark vs Lancaster

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Chilmark has grown the fastest since 2010 (+40%).
Lancaster has the most affordable homes ($519k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureChilmarkLancaster
People
Population
1,578Lowest
8,606Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+40%Highest
MA: +7.4%
+4.8%Lowest
MA: +7.4%
Median age
53.6±8.1Highest
34% above MA
43.1±4.9Lowest
8% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
16.7%±4.3Lowest
MA: 19.4%
19.2%±4Highest
MA: 19.4%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
36.2%±12.4Highest
MA: 17.9%
19.9%±4.2Lowest
MA: 17.9%
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
68.1%Highest
MA: 47.3%
50.3%Lowest
MA: 47.3%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.7%±2.6Lowest
MA: 7.9%
3%±1.8Highest
MA: 7.9%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$168,750±$28kHighest
62% above MA
$134,833±$27kLowest
30% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$1,895,300±$281kHighest
237% above MA
$519,100±$60kLowest
8% below MA
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$2,750±$2kHighest
56% above MA
$2,338±$539Lowest
33% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,485Lowest
25% below MA
$7,235Highest
21% above MA
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
30.8%±59.9Lowest
MA: 51.8%
68.3%±36.7Highest
MA: 51.8%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
4.1%Highest
MA: 10%
1.4%Lowest
MA: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
89.4%Highest
MA: 62.5%
85.1%Lowest
MA: 62.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1984Highest
20 yrs newer than MA
1971Lowest
7 yrs newer than MA
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
32 minLowest
8% above MA
32 minHighest
9% above MA
Work from home
25.7%±11Lowest
MA: 18.6%
33.6%±9.1Highest
MA: 18.6%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #145 of 282 in MA
School district Up-Island Regional Nashoba
High school in town None in town None in town
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet

MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.