Compare towns
Chicopee vs Lisbon vs Windsor Locks
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Chicopee has the most renters (44.3% rent).
Lisbon has the most homeowners (97.9%).
Windsor Locks has the most people working from home (17.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Chicopee | Lisbon | Windsor Locks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 55,295Highest |
4,211Lowest |
12,579 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
— | — |
| Median age | 41.9±1.4 8% above U.S. |
44.5±5.2Highest 14% above U.S. |
41.4±2.6Lowest 6% above U.S. |
| Lisbon and Chicopee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±1.7 U.S.: 22% |
22.1%±6.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
18.6%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Lisbon and Chicopee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.5%±1.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
21.3%±4.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
18.2%±2.7Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Lisbon and Chicopee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.9% U.S.: 35.7% |
19.2%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
28.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.7%±0.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.2%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
5.9%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Windsor Locks and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $62,615±$6kLowest 22% below U.S. |
$92,708±$12kHighest 15% above U.S. |
$81,205±$13k about the U.S. average |
| Lisbon and Windsor Locks are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $274,500±$8k 17% below U.S. |
$315,700±$26kHighest 5% below U.S. |
$258,800±$14kLowest 22% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,157±$50Lowest 18% below U.S. |
— | $1,394±$187Highest about the U.S. average |
| Windsor Locks and Chicopee are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,847 23% above U.S. |
$4,044Highest 30% above U.S. |
$3,688Lowest 18% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52%±5.6Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
100%±75.1Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
58.2%±16.8 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lisbon and Windsor Locks are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 17.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
6.6%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
10.9% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 55.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
97.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
77.1% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1958Lowest 22 yrs older than U.S. |
1976Highest 4 yrs older than U.S. |
1961 19 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 minLowest 19% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
22 min 17% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 8%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
8.3%±3.4 U.S.: 15.1% |
17.7%±3.7Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #247 of 282 in MA | #102 of 149 in CT | #109 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Chicopee | Lisbon School District | Windsor Locks School District |
| High school in town | Chicopee Comprehensive High School | None in town | Windsor Locks High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.2Highest |
— | 8.9Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.