Compare towns
Charlotte vs Starksboro vs Jericho
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Charlotte has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.2%).
Starksboro has the most affordable homes ($288k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Charlotte | Starksboro | Jericho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,916 |
1,939Lowest |
5,114Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.9% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 52.2±5Highest 21% above VT |
38.2±4.8Lowest 11% below VT |
49.7±5.1 15% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.6%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
26.4%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Starksboro and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.3%±5.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.4%±2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4 VT: 21.4% |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 66.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
65.3% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.4%±1.2Lowest VT: 7% |
3.1%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6 VT: 7% |
| Starksboro and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $144,375±$27kHighest 78% above VT |
$82,188±$15kLowest about the VT average |
$116,923±$16k 44% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $695,300±$53kHighest 120% above VT |
$287,700±$42kLowest 9% below VT |
$493,100±$38k 56% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,738±$803Highest 41% above VT |
$1,306±$91Lowest 6% above VT |
$1,731±$111 40% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $9,221Highest 83% above VT |
$4,536Lowest 10% below VT |
$7,318 45% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 56.1%±28.6 VT: 48.4% |
28.6%±26.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.7% VT: 10.1% |
7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
91.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
92.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Lowest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1986Highest 10 yrs newer than VT |
1983 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 minLowest 7% above VT |
29 minHighest 24% above VT |
26 min 10% above VT |
| Work from home | 29.8%±8.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±4.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4 VT: 16.9% |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #3 of 70 in VT | — | #6 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Champlain Valley Unified Union School District #56 | Mt. Abraham Unified School District #61 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Mt. Mansfield Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 13.0 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.