Compare towns
Charlotte vs Shelburne vs Underhill
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Charlotte has the highest household income ($144k).
Shelburne has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8%).
Underhill has the most kids (27.8% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Charlotte | Shelburne | Underhill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,916 |
7,969Highest |
3,141Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.2% VT: +2.8% |
+8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+3.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 52.2±5Highest 21% above VT |
50.9±3.2 18% above VT |
38.1±11.4Lowest 12% below VT |
| Charlotte and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.6%±4.5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
20.2%±3.9 VT: 17.9% |
27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.3%±5.2 VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Shelburne and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 66.2% VT: 43.8% |
70.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
50.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.4%±1.2Lowest VT: 7% |
4.7%±2.9Highest VT: 7% |
3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
| Shelburne and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $144,375±$27kHighest 78% above VT |
$115,963±$16k 43% above VT |
$92,267±$54kLowest 14% above VT |
| Charlotte and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $695,300±$53kHighest 120% above VT |
$588,100±$44k 86% above VT |
$446,000±$24kLowest 41% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,738±$803Highest 41% above VT |
$1,442±$589Lowest 17% above VT |
— |
| Charlotte and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $9,221Highest 83% above VT |
$8,173 62% above VT |
$6,697Lowest 33% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 56.1%±28.6Highest VT: 48.4% |
43.7%±10.6 VT: 48.4% |
0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Charlotte and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
8.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.4% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
69.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.8% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982 6 yrs newer than VT |
1986Highest 10 yrs newer than VT |
1979Lowest 3 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 7% above VT |
20 minLowest 14% below VT |
33 minHighest 39% above VT |
| Work from home | 29.8%±8.6 VT: 16.9% |
31.4%±7.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
19.4%±11.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Shelburne and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #3 of 70 in VT | #8 of 70 in VT | #2 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Champlain Valley Unified Union School District #56 | Champlain Valley Unified Union School District #56 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.