Compare towns
Charlemont vs Killingly vs Shelburne
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Charlemont has the most homeowners (78.3%).
Killingly has the most kids (19.8% under 18).
Shelburne has the most expensive homes ($405k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Charlemont | Killingly | Shelburne |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,118Lowest |
17,867Highest |
1,567 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
— | -0.5%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 59.6±6.7Highest 53% above U.S. |
39.5±3Lowest about the U.S. average |
57±7.3 47% above U.S. |
| Charlemont and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 7%±2.5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±2.3Highest U.S.: 22% |
12.5%±4 U.S.: 22% |
| Age 65+ | 41.1%±10.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.7%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
38.4%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Charlemont and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 29% U.S.: 35.7% |
22.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
51.7%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1%±0.7Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.4%±1.9Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.2%±1.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Killingly and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,063±$12kLowest 34% below U.S. |
$84,350±$8kHighest 4% above U.S. |
$83,000±$4k about the U.S. average |
| Killingly and Shelburne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $305,500±$52k 8% below U.S. |
$288,600±$15kLowest 13% below U.S. |
$405,400±$32kHighest 22% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,023±$126Lowest 28% below U.S. |
$1,044±$141 26% below U.S. |
$1,080±$105Highest 24% below U.S. |
| Shelburne and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,351 39% above U.S. |
$3,922Lowest 26% above U.S. |
$4,595Highest 47% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 56.1%±18.8Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
42.8%±10.9 U.S.: 51.1% |
39.1%±7.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Charlemont and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
11.4% U.S.: 12.5% |
10.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 78.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
71.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
67.8%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1965 15 yrs older than U.S. |
1968Highest 12 yrs older than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 37 minHighest 40% above U.S. |
28 minLowest 6% above U.S. |
29 min 8% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 16.5%±6.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
11.1%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
17.7%±6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Shelburne and Charlemont are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #136 of 149 in CT | — |
| School district | Hawlemont | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Mohawk Trail |
| High school in town | None in town | Killingly High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 11.1 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.