Compare towns

Chapman vs Epping vs Hooksett vs Ludlow

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Chapman has the most kids (27.6% under 18).
Epping has the most people working from home (24%).
Hooksett has the highest household income ($118k).
Ludlow has the most affordable homes ($134k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureChapmanEppingHooksettLudlow
People
Population
388Lowest
7,430
15,057Highest
444
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
+11.1%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
+10.6%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
Median age
45.7±11.4
17% above U.S.
45.1±3.5
16% above U.S.
41.3±1.5Lowest
6% above U.S.
46.1±5.8Highest
19% above U.S.
Ludlow and Chapman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
27.6%±5.9Highest
U.S.: 22%
18.7%±4.8
U.S.: 22%
17.4%±2.9Lowest
U.S.: 22%
22.7%±5.9
U.S.: 22%
Chapman and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
27.6%±3.8Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
22.6%±5.2
U.S.: 17.2%
17.3%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
12.4%±3.6Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
Chapman and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
22.8%
U.S.: 35.7%
37%
U.S.: 35.7%
39.6%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
16.2%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.2%±2.6
U.S.: 6.4%
5.1%±3.3
U.S.: 6.4%
8.9%±1.6Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
2.7%±3.1Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Hooksett and Chapman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$93,125±$17k
15% above U.S.
$104,220±$7k
29% above U.S.
$117,962±$11kHighest
46% above U.S.
$62,500±$21kLowest
23% below U.S.
Hooksett and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$185,700±$22k
44% below U.S.
$436,900±$35kHighest
31% above U.S.
$407,000±$26k
22% above U.S.
$133,900±$56kLowest
60% below U.S.
Epping and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly —
$1,742±$576Highest
23% above U.S.
$1,661±$206
18% above U.S.
$988±$111Lowest
30% below U.S.
Epping and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$1,850
41% below U.S.
$6,936Highest
122% above U.S.
$6,554
110% above U.S.
$1,655Lowest
47% below U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
0%±100Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
67.8%±25.9Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
41.7%±16.4
U.S.: 51.1%
45.5%±94.3
U.S.: 51.1%
Epping and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
6.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
4.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
3.3%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
15.3%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
94.5%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
86.3%
U.S.: 65.2%
80.6%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
90.4%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1982Lowest
2 yrs newer than U.S.
1989
9 yrs newer than U.S.
1988
8 yrs newer than U.S.
1992Highest
12 yrs newer than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
23 min
12% below U.S.
32 minHighest
22% above U.S.
27 min
about the U.S. average
21 minLowest
21% below U.S.
Work from home
4.8%±3.5Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
24%±6.9Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
13.4%±3.1
U.S.: 15.1%
9.8%±8
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #77 of 120 in NH #30 of 120 in NH —
School district — Epping School District Hooksett School District —
High school in town — Epping High School None in town —
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.3
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.