Compare towns
Cavendish vs Tunbridge vs Worcester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Cavendish has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Tunbridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.1%).
Worcester has the most affordable homes ($271k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Cavendish | Tunbridge | Worcester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,242 |
1,253Highest |
831Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.8% VT: +2.8% |
+4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 45.2±5.9 5% above VT |
42.7±8.3Lowest about the VT average |
47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
| Worcester and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.3%±4.8 VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Tunbridge and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.6%±2Highest VT: 21.4% |
20.9%±1.6 VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Cavendish and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
42.9% VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.3%±1.9 VT: 7% |
3.6%±2Lowest VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,063±$29k 10% above VT |
$89,464±$26kHighest 10% above VT |
$73,833±$18kLowest 9% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $285,100±$40k 10% below VT |
$315,300±$23kHighest about the VT average |
$271,100±$27kLowest 14% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,000±$546Lowest 19% below VT |
$1,346±$128Highest 9% above VT |
$1,023±$136 17% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,645Highest 8% below VT |
$4,421 12% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 28.9%±27 VT: 48.4% |
76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.3% VT: 10.1% |
14.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 81.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
84.2% VT: 73.2% |
85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1976 same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 21% below VT |
31 minHighest 31% above VT |
29 min 22% above VT |
| Work from home | 18.5%±6.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8 VT: 16.9% |
| Tunbridge and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 | First Branch Unified School District #82 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | 18 photos → | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.